🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 is remembered as one of the most fatal – and consequential – occasions during multiple decades of violence in Northern Ireland.

Within the community where it happened – the images of that fateful day are displayed on the structures and etched in public consciousness.

A protest demonstration was held on a wintry, sunny day in Derry.

The march was challenging the policy of imprisonment without charges – holding suspects without legal proceedings – which had been established after an extended period of unrest.

Military personnel from the Parachute Regiment killed thirteen individuals in the Bogside area – which was, and remains, a overwhelmingly Irish nationalist area.

One image became particularly memorable.

Photographs showed a religious figure, the priest, waving a stained with blood cloth in his effort to protect a group transporting a youth, the fatally wounded individual, who had been fatally wounded.

Journalists recorded considerable film on the day.

The archive features Fr Daly informing a journalist that military personnel "gave the impression they would discharge weapons randomly" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no provocation for the gunfire.

The narrative of events was rejected by the first inquiry.

The initial inquiry determined the soldiers had been shot at first.

In the negotiation period, the ruling party established a new investigation, in response to advocacy by bereaved relatives, who said the first investigation had been a inadequate investigation.

During 2010, the conclusion by Lord Saville said that on balance, the paratroopers had initiated shooting and that none of the individuals had been armed.

The contemporary Prime Minister, the leader, expressed regret in the Parliament – declaring killings were "unjustified and unacceptable."

Law enforcement started to investigate the events.

One former paratrooper, known as the accused, was prosecuted for killing.

Accusations were made concerning the killings of the first individual, twenty-two, and 26-year-old another victim.

The defendant was further implicated of seeking to harm multiple individuals, other civilians, more people, an additional individual, and an unidentified individual.

Remains a judicial decision maintaining the veteran's anonymity, which his lawyers have maintained is necessary because he is at threat.

He told the Saville Inquiry that he had solely shot at individuals who were carrying weapons.

The statement was disputed in the concluding document.

Information from the examination could not be used straightforwardly as proof in the criminal process.

In the dock, the defendant was screened from view using a privacy screen.

He made statements for the opening instance in the hearing at a proceeding in December 2024, to respond "not guilty" when the allegations were presented.

Family members of those who were killed on the incident travelled from the city to the courthouse daily of the proceedings.

A family member, whose brother Michael was killed, said they always knew that attending the proceedings would be painful.

"I remember everything in my mind's eye," John said, as we walked around the primary sites mentioned in the case – from Rossville Street, where his brother was killed, to the adjacent the courtyard, where one victim and the second person were died.

"It reminds me to my location that day.

"I participated in moving the victim and put him in the ambulance.

"I went through every moment during the evidence.

"But even with enduring everything – it's still valuable for me."